EPD-IES-0032334:001

Photovoltaic mounting structures

The photovoltaic ground mounting structure is designed for utility-scale installations with table lengths of up to 30 m and module inclinations between 10° and 30°. It accommodates two- or three-row portrait module layouts with clamped module fastening and multiple foundation options to suit varying site conditions. The system can compensate for ground level differences of up to 0.5 m and is engineered to withstand snow loads of up to 1.6 kN/m² and wind speeds of up to 25 m/s. The structure is backed by a warranty of more than 10 years. The structure supports approximately 4,716 m² of PV module area, corresponding to about 1,667 modules of 600 Wp each with dimensions 1,303 × 2,172 mm.

General information

EPD OwnerSzermann Kft
Registration numberEPD-IES-0032334:001
EPD typeEPD of multiple products based on the average results of the product group
StatusValid
Version date2026-06-18
Validity date2031-06-17
Standards conformanceISO 14025:2006, EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021
Geographical scopeEurope
An EPD may be updated or depublished if conditions change. This is the latest version of the EPD.

Programme information

ProgrammeInternational EPD System
AddressEPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden
Websitewww.environdec.com
E-mailsupport@environdec.com

Product category rules

CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR)
Product Category Rules (PCR)2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (version 2.0.1) 2.0.1
PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Rob Rouwette (chair), Noa Meron (co-chair). The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support.

Verification

Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via
Third-party verifierSilvia Vilčeková (SILCERT, Ltd.)
Approved byThe International EPD® System
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.environdec.com.

Ownership and limitation on use of EPD

Limitations

EPDs within the same product category but published in different EPD programmes, may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same first-digit version number) or be based on fully aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have identical scope in terms of included life-cycle stages (unless the excluded life-cycle stage is demonstrated to be insignificant); apply identical impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); and be valid at the time of comparison.

Ownership

The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.

Information about EPD Owner

EPD OwnerSzermann Kft
Contact person nameBalázs Fülöp
Contact person e-mailfulop.balazs@szermann.hu
Organisation addressSzentlőrinci út 15/8 Szentlőrinci út 15/8 7634 Pécs Hungary
LCA PractitionerArtur Szilágyi, artur@lifecycle.hu

Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner

Szermann Kft., a Hungarian manufacturer of solar mounting structures, holds several quality management and manufacturing certifications to ensure industry compliance. Their official corporate and product certifications include: ISO 9001:2015: Quality Management System, ISO 14001:2015: Environmental Management System, EN 1090-EXC2: Execution of steel structures, allowing for structural steel manufacturing and compliance across the EU, EN ISO 1461: Specification for hot dip galvanized coatings on fabricated iron and steel articles and EN ISO 3834-2: Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials

Organisation images

Organisation logo

Product information

Product namePhotovoltaic mounting structure
Product identificationPhotovoltaic mounting structures produced by Szermann Kft, in various design formats such as Classic, East-West and Classic Mini product families.
Product descriptionThe photovoltaic ground mounting structure is designed for utility-scale installations with table lengths of up to 30 m and module inclinations between 10° and 30°. It accommodates two- or three-row portrait module layouts with clamped module fastening and multiple foundation options to suit varying site conditions. The system can compensate for ground level differences of up to 0.5 m and is engineered to withstand snow loads of up to 1.6 kN/m² and wind speeds of up to 25 m/s. The structure is backed by a warranty of more than 10 years. The structure supports approximately 4,716 m² of PV module area, corresponding to about 1,667 modules of 600 Wp each with dimensions 1,303 × 2,172 mm.
Product information from external sourceshttps://www.szermann.hu/en#termekeink
Technical purpose of productThe photovoltaic ground mounting structures manufactured by Szermann Kft. are intended to support and secure solar photovoltaic (PV) modules in ground-mounted solar power installations. The structures are suitable for a variety of project configurations, including fixed-tilt systems, east–west layouts, and custom-designed arrangements adapted to site-specific conditions, terrain, and project requirements. They are designed to provide long-term structural stability and reliable support throughout the service life of the PV installation.
Manufacturing or service provision descriptionThe structural steels of grades S235, S275, and S355, as well as the aluminium materials used in production, are assigned incoming identification codes to ensure full traceability. Before the actual processing begins, the production plans are reviewed by the production manager and the shift supervisor. This is followed by the cutting stage, during which the materials are cut to the required dimensions according to the specified cutting plan, with efforts made to minimise waste generation. To ensure accurate inclination angles, precise cuts are carried out using high-performance sawing machines. In the machining phase, hole drilling and press shop operations lay the groundwork for the on-site assembly of the structures, which is then followed by the welding process. The company utilizes a jig-based welding technology to ensure geometric accuracy and repeatability; additionally, serial production efficiency is enhanced through the use of a welding robot. The corrosion protection of the finished products is ensured through galvanization performed by an external partner. The process concludes with the logistics stage, during which the strapped crates, labelled with identification codes, are dispatched to the project site together with the required delivery notes and accompanying documentation, in accordance with project requirements.
Material propertiesMass per piece: 26000 kg/piece
Mass per piece:
26000 kg/piece
Manufacturing siteSzermann Kft Pécs Szentlőrinci út 15/8. 7634 Pécs Hungary
UN CPC code41262. Angles, shapes and sections, cold-formed, cold-finished or further worked, of iron or non-alloy steel
Geographical scopeEurope

Product images

Content declaration

Content declaration of multiple productsContent declaration represents an average product.
Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Steel2471511.7600
Aluminium145000
Zinc940000
Chromium steel200000
Total2600011.7600
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

LCA information

EPD based on declared or functional unitDeclared unit
Declared unit and reference flowPhotovoltaic mounting structure Number of pieces: 1 piece(s)
Conversion factor to mass26000
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes?
Datasources used for this EPDecoinvent database (general) ecoinvent 3.12 database
LCA SoftwareOpenLCA 2.6.0
Version of the EN 15804 reference packageEF Reference Package 3.1
Characterisation methodsEuropean Commission: Joint Research Centre, "Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the environmental footprint 3.1 method," Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
Technology description including background systemThe photovoltaic ground mounting structure is designed to support 1 MWp of installed solar PV capacity in ground-mounted systems. The average structure weighs 26.0 tonnes and consists primarily of steel (95.1%), with smaller amounts of zinc coating, stainless steel, and aluminium. Results are based on an average product model representing all mounting structures manufactured at the facility during 2025; production includes cutting, machining, welding, and external hot-dip galvanizing, and the structure has a reference service life of 25 years. 100% recycling is assumed as End of Life scenario.
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution levelLess than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs

Data quality assessment

Description of data quality assessment and reference yearsPrimary data were collected for the most recent completed fiscal year (2025). No poor or very poor data used for the analysis.
Data quality assessment
Process nameSource typeSourceReference yearData categoryShare of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3
ManufacturingDatabase, measurementEPD Owner2025Primary data1%
Raw materialsDatabase, EPDecoinvent v3.12 and 2 supplier EPDs2025Primary and secondary data12%
End-of-LifeDatabaseecoinvent v3.122025Secondary data0%
Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A313%
The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that supports the use of more primary data to increase the representativeness of and comparability between EPDs. Note that the indicator does not capture all relevant aspects of data quality and is not comparable across product categories.
Electricity data
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 (A5 for services)
Type of electricity mixSpecific electricity mix as generated, or purchased from an electricity supplier, demonstrated by a contractual instrument
Energy sourcesHydro1.7%
Wind5.05%
Solar21.09%
Biomass5.74%
Geothermal0%
Waste0%
Nuclear35.9%
Natural gas18.38%
Coal9.54%
Oil0%
Peat0%
Other1.08%
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh)0.29 kg CO2 eq./kWh

System boundary

Description of the system boundarya) Cradle to gate with modules C1-C4 and module D (A1-A3 + C + D).
Excluded modulesNo, there is no excluded module, or there are no excluded modules

Declared modules

Product stageConstruction process stageUse stageEnd of life stageBeyond product life cycle
Raw material supplyTransportManufacturingTransport to siteConstruction installationUseMaintenanceRepairReplacementRefurbishmentOperational energy useOperational water useDe-construction demolitionTransportWaste processingDisposalReuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential
ModuleA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Modules declaredXXXNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDXXXXX
GeographyEuropeEuropeHungaryN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AEuropeEuropeEuropeEuropeEurope
Share of specific data13%--------------
Variation - products20%--------------
Variation - sites0%--------------
DisclaimerThe share of specific/primary data and both variations (products and sites) refer to GWP-GHG results only.

Process flow diagram(s) related images

Default scenario

Name of the default scenario100% recycling scenario
Description of the default scenarioC1–C4 cover dismantling, transport and recycling of metal; no final disposal. Only the virgin share (52.8%) of steel receives Module D credits.

Module C: End-of-life

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module C100% recycling
Brief description of the default scenario in module CC1–C4 cover dismantling, transport and recycling of metal; no final disposal
Description of the default scenario in module CModules C1–C4 cover the end-of-life treatment of the product, including dismantling with diesel-operated machinery, transport of waste over 80 km by road, and subsequent sorting and processing of the recovered steel scrap; the final disposal stage (C4) is assumed to be zero, as 100% of the material is sent to recycling.
Module C informationValueUnit
Transport distance to sorting facility80
km
Fraction of recycled material100
%

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module D100% recycling
Brief description of the default scenario in module DOnly the virgin share (52.8%) receives Module D credits.
Description of the default scenario in module DThe steel components contain an average recycled content of 47.2%, based on supplier-specific EPD data and the ecoinvent dataset "market for steel, low-alloyed, GLO"; therefore, in accordance with EN 15804+A2 and the recycled content (cut-off) approach, only the non-recycled share of the recovered steel scrap is credited in Module D as avoided primary steel production, modelled using the ecoinvent dataset "steel production, converter, low-alloyed, RoW". Loads from recycling is covered by "steel production, electric, low-alloyed, RER"

Environmental performance

The estimated impact results are only relative statements, which do not indicate the endpoints of the impact categories, exceeding threshold values, safety margins and/or risks.

Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.5.81E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.57E+23.97E+26.73E+20.00E+0-2.27E+4
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.5.75E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.57E+23.96E+26.80E+20.00E+0-2.28E+4
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.4.13E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND5.84E-22.53E-1-7.99E+00.00E+05.57E+1
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.1.16E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.61E-21.28E-19.15E-10.00E+0-1.02E+1
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.1.06E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND5.49E-68.95E-69.77E-60.00E+0-9.54E-5
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.1.89E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.19E+01.24E+07.41E+00.00E+0-8.96E+1
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.3.40E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.15E-22.75E-24.11E-10.00E+0-1.26E+1
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg N eq.2.41E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.49E+04.33E-11.74E+00.00E+0-2.19E+1
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.5.42E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.63E+14.70E+01.95E+10.00E+0-2.25E+2
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.6.42E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.90E+01.97E+05.85E+00.00E+0-8.13E+1
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADP-minerals&metals1kg Sb eq.4.03E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.33E-41.38E-34.17E-20.00E+0-1.66E-1
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossil1MJ, net calorific value6.91E+5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.63E+35.59E+39.06E+30.00E+0-2.26E+5
Water useWDP1m3 world eq. deprived3.00E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.16E+12.91E+11.57E+20.00E+0-1.03E+4
AcronymsGWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator

Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG1kg CO2 eq.5.76E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.57E+23.96E+26.82E+20.00E+0-2.28E+4
AcronymsGWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.

Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Particulate matter emissionsPMDisease incidence1.36E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND9.11E-53.16E-51.05E-40.00E+0-2.15E-3
Ionizing radiation - human healthIRP1kBq U235 eq.4.05E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.94E+06.38E+06.37E+10.00E+06.80E+2
Eco-toxicity - freshwaterETP-fw2CTUe1.42E+6NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.70E+28.28E+25.06E+30.00E+0-1.80E+5
Human toxicity - cancer effectsHTP-c2CTUh1.10E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.43E-86.47E-85.27E-70.00E+0-2.67E-5
Human toxicity - non-cancer effectsHTP-nc2CTUh1.52E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND6.11E-73.40E-63.64E-50.00E+0-4.17E-4
Land-use related impacts/soil qualitySQP2Dimensionless2.04E+5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.21E+23.32E+31.62E+40.00E+0-6.77E+4
AcronymsPM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
Disclaimer 2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator.

Resource use indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
PEREMJ, net calorific value7.41E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.91E+19.19E+11.49E+30.00E+0-1.43E+4
PERMMJ, net calorific value6.79E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PERTMJ, net calorific value7.48E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.91E+19.19E+11.49E+30.00E+0-1.43E+4
PENREMJ, net calorific value6.92E+5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.63E+35.59E+39.07E+30.00E+0-2.26E+5
PENRMMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PENRTMJ, net calorific value6.92E+5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.63E+35.59E+39.07E+30.00E+0-2.26E+5
SMkg-1.06E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.63E+05.41E+02.60E+40.00E+01.02E+4
RSFMJ, net calorific value1.09E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.68E-11.27E+01.79E+10.00E+03.80E+2
NRSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
FWm35.31E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.79E-16.61E-13.61E+00.00E+0-8.81E+1
AcronymsPERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Waste indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
HWDkg6.54E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.51E+13.41E+11.20E+30.00E+0-2.91E+4
NHWDkg2.39E+5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND7.50E+14.49E+22.40E+30.00E+0-1.11E+5
RWDkg1.13E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.55E-41.55E-31.60E-20.00E+01.75E-1
AcronymsHWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Output flow indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
CRUkg0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
MFRkg3.77E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+02.60E+40.00E+00.00E+0
MERkg6.10E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.24E+04.99E+03.88E+10.00E+0-2.62E+3
EEEMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EETMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsCRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Description of how the averages have been determinedAnnual consumption of raw materials, purchased components, energy, packaging materials, and other relevant inputs was compiled for the facility and related to the total photovoltaic capacity (MWp) of mounting structures delivered during fiscal year 2025. The average inputs per declared unit were calculated by dividing the annual inputs by the total installed capacity. As only one manufacturing site is included, no averaging across production sites was required.

Abbreviations

Not applicable

References

European Committee for Standardization, "EN 15804+A2:2019/AC:2021: Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products, 2021," CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels, 18 August 2021.

The International EPD® System, "General Programme Instructions of the International EPD® System. Version 5.0.1," 2025-02-27.

The International EPD® System, "Product Category Rules (PCR) for Construction Products (PCR 2019:14 version 2.0.1, date 2025-06-05)".

European Commission: Joint Research Centre, "Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the environmental footprint 3.1 method," Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.

International Standardization Organisation, ISO 15941:2024 Sustainability of construction works. Data quality for environmental assessment of products and construction work. Selection and use of data, 2024. 

Version history

Original version, 2026-06-18