EPD-IES-0025086:003

NP Ultra window handles

NP Ultra window handle with key-operated lock. Reversible, same window handle for both Side-Hung and Tilt-and-Turn. Used in combination with NP ULTRA Mechanisms. It is locked to the profile by screwing the 2 special screws, pre-assembled on the window handle body, into the fixing plate provided in the mechanism. There is no need for any milling on the sash tubular profile, it only requires straightforward machining on the profile wall (3 holes Ø6.2 mm), so there is a specific punch. In the Logica version When the pull handle is at 180°, and therefore the sash is in the fully open position, it is not possible to remove the key from the cylinder (Key Capture system). Handle and packaging customizable with the logo of the customer. Finishes: • Base Painting (allows the customer to paint the product as if it were a raw product), • Powder coatings •TREND BE finishes

General information

EPD OwnerGIESSE S.p.A.
Registration numberEPD-IES-0025086:003
PCR2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) 2.0.1
c-PCR2019:14-c-PCR-007 Being updated - Windows and doors (EN 17213) (c-PCR to PCR 2019:14) 1.0.0
StatusValid
Publication date2025-11-05
Valid until2030-11-02
EN 15804 compliantYes
Geographical scopeGlobal

Product images

Programme information

ProgrammeInternational EPD System
AddressEPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden
Websitewww.environdec.com
E-mailsupport@environdec.com

Product category rules

CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR)
Product Category Rules (PCR)PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (2.0.1)
PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Rob Rouwette (chair), Noa Meron (co-chair). The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support.
Complementary Product Category Rules (c-PCR)PCR 2019:14-c-PCR-007 Being updated - Windows and doors (EN 17213) (c-PCR to PCR 2019:14) (1.0.0) Version: 1.0.0
c-PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System

Verification

LCA accountabilityValerio Venturi, valerio.venturi@schlegelgiesse.com, GIESSE S.p.A.
Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via
Third-party verifierMichela Gallo (University of Genoa)
Approved byInternational EPD System
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.envrondec.com.

Ownership and limitation on use of EPD

Limitations

EPDs within the same product category but published in different EPD programmes, may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same first-digit version number) or be based on fully aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have identical scope in terms of included life-cycle stages (unless the excluded life-cycle stage is demonstrated to be insignificant); apply identical impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); and be valid at the time of comparison.

Ownership

The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.

Information about EPD Owner

EPD OwnerGIESSE S.p.A.
Contact person nameValerio Venturi
Contact person e-mailvalerio.venturi@quanex.com
Organisation addressItaly Budrio (Bologna) 40054 Via Tubertini 1, 40054

Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner

GIESSE S.p.A. founded in 1965, in the province of Bologna, is specialized in the production of manual accessories for aluminum windows and doors. In 2016 it was acquired by Schlegel, a leading British company in the sealing systems sector. Both companies were part of the international division of Tyman PLC, a group listed on the London Stock Exchange, with a commercial network capable of reaching customers in over 100 countries and offering them the highest degree of satisfaction, a wide range of standard components and boasts over 150 patents filed. In 2024, the entire Tyman group and its brands, including Giesse, were acquired by the American multinational Quanex, forming a new major group in the sector, with a turnover of over 2 billion. Quanex Building Products Corporation, listed on the NY Stock Exchange, is a manufacturing group that offers building product solutions that include hardware solutions (door/window hardware, screens), extruded solutions (spacers, vinyl profiles for doors and windows, gaskets and sealing systems) and custom solutions (solutions for the wood, mixed and building access industries.

Organisation images

Organisation logo

Product information

Product nameitems 00983, 009841/2, 03971, 0397101, 039721/2, 039731/2, 03974, 0397401, 039751/2, 039761/2, 052661/2, 052671/2
Product identificationitem codes # 00983, 009841/2, 03971, 0397101, 039721/2, 039731/2, 03974, 0397401, 039751/2, 039761/2, 052661/2, 052671/2 in all different finishes: painted, trend BE or raw to be painted by customer
Product descriptionNP Ultra window handle with key-operated lock. Reversible, same window handle for both Side-Hung and Tilt-and-Turn. Used in combination with NP ULTRA Mechanisms. It is locked to the profile by screwing the 2 special screws, pre-assembled on the window handle body, into the fixing plate provided in the mechanism. There is no need for any milling on the sash tubular profile, it only requires straightforward machining on the profile wall (3 holes Ø6.2 mm), so there is a specific punch. In the Logica version When the pull handle is at 180°, and therefore the sash is in the fully open position, it is not possible to remove the key from the cylinder (Key Capture system). Handle and packaging customizable with the logo of the customer. Finishes: • Base Painting (allows the customer to paint the product as if it were a raw product), • Powder coatings •TREND BE finishes
Technical purpose of productWindow handle
Manufacturing or service provision descriptionchemical treatment , painting, pad printing of the lever handle assembly of lever handle and other components packaging
Material propertiesVolumetric mass density: 5370 kg/m3 Mass per piece: 0.286 kg/piece
Manufacturing siteGIESSE S.p.A. Budrio Italy Budrio (Bologna) 40054 Via Tubertini 1
UN CPC code42992. Padlocks and locks, of base metal; clasps and frames with clasps, incorporating locks, of base metal; keys and parts thereof, of base metal; base metal fittings for furniture, doors, saddlery and the like
Geographical scopeGlobal
Actual or technical lifespan30 year(s)

Content declaration

Content declaration of multiple productscontent declaration refers to the representative product
Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Alunium alloy0.12000
Zinc alloy0.11000
Steel and polymers0.06000
Total0.29000
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2
Packaging materials
Material nameMass, kgMass-% (versus the product)Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Cardboard0.043.60.02
Wood0.0111.10
Plastic0.012.80
Total0.0617.500.02
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

LCA information

EPD based on declared or functional unitDeclared unit
Declared unit and reference flowHandle Mass: 1 kg
Conversion factor to mass1
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes?
Datasources used for this EPDecoinvent database (general) ecoinvent 3.9.1 database
LCA SoftwareSimaPro SimaPro 9.5
Version of the EN 15804 reference packageEF Reference Package 3.1
Characterisation methodsEN 15804 + A2. Version EF 3.1 July 2022
Technology description including background systemWindow handle with key-operated lock. The product considered consists mainly of die-cast aluminium
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution levelLess than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs

Data quality assessment

Description of data quality assessment and reference yearsData quality is compliant with ISO 14025:2006, and assessed as per EN15941. All primary data were collected for 2024, there is no very poor data used.
Data quality assessment
Process nameSource typeSourceReference yearData categoryShare of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3
Manufacturing of productData collectionEPD Owner2024Primary data69%
Thermal energyDatabaseEcoinvent<5 yearsPrimary data20%
Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A389%
The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that supports the use of more primary data to increase the representativeness of and comparability between EPDs. Note that the indicator does not capture all relevant aspects of data quality and is not comparable across product categories.
Comment on the data sources and other information in the tableData refer to product 03974 (005) base painting
Electricity data
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 (A5 for services)
Type of electricity mixSpecific electricity mix as generated, or purchased from an electricity supplier, demonstrated by a contractual instrument
Energy sourcesHydro0%
Wind0%
Solar100%
Biomass0%
Geothermal0%
Waste0%
Nuclear0%
Natural gas0%
Coal0%
Oil0%
Peat0%
Other0%
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh)0.19 kg CO2 eq./kWh

System boundary

Description of the system boundaryb) Cradle to gate with options, modules C1-C4, module D and with optional modules (A1-A3 + C + D and additional modules).
Excluded modulesYes, there is an excluded module, or there are excluded modules
Justification for the omission of modulesModules of use stage excluded as optional

Declared modules

Product stageConstruction process stageUse stageEnd of life stageBeyond product life cycle
Raw material supplyTransportManufacturingTransport to siteConstruction installationUseMaintenanceRepairReplacementRefurbishmentOperational energy useOperational water useDe-construction demolitionTransportWaste processingDisposalReuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential
ModuleA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Modules declaredXXXXXNDNDNDNDNDNDNDXXXXX
GeographyGlobalEuropeEuropeEuropeEuropeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AGlobalGlobalGlobalGlobalEurope
Share of specific data89%--------------
Variation - products5%--------------
Variation - sites0%--------------
DisclaimerThe share of specific/primary data and both variations (products and sites) refer to GWP-GHG results only.

Process flow diagram(s) related images

Default scenario

Name of the default scenarioStandard
Description of the default scenarioScenario considers the transport of the handle to the building site and the installation in the window

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A4Transport to building
Brief description of the default scenario in module A4Product is transported to the building site by truck
Description of the default scenario in module A4Given the variability of product sales and consequently at the construction site in various regions of the world, it was decided to adopt the provisions of EN 17610:2022 adapting the capacity utilization
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
3500
km
Capacity utilization (including empty returns)
56
%

Module A5: Installation in the building

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A5Installation
Brief description of the default scenario in module A5This stage describes impacts related to installing the handle into the building.
Description of the default scenario in module A5Since this is a manual process, no energy or fuels is needed for installation, then module analyses the recovery of packaging incurred as waste during product installation. Data sourced from Eurostat Packaging waste by waste management operations, 2022
Module A5 informationValueUnit
Wood waste to landfill36
%
Wood waste to energy recovery30
%
Wood waste to recycle34
%
Plastic waste to landfill24
%
Plastic waste to energy recovery35
%
Plastic waste to recycle41
%
Cardboard waste to landfill7
%
Cardboard waste to energy recovery10
%
Cardboard waste to recycle83
%

Module C: End-of-life

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module CDeinstallation
Brief description of the default scenario in module CEnd of life stages
Description of the default scenario in module CThe demolition phase of the building site includes all deconstruction operations, including the initial dismantling and sorting on site of the handle. In the absence of primary data relating to the waste transport to the treatment plant, default data for modelling module were assumed according to relevant PCR 2019:14 2.0.1. A recycle ratio of 90% of metal parts of handle and 75% of plastic parts of handle are considered. Remaining 10% of metal is landfilled, 20% of plastic is recovered and 5% of plastic is landfilled
Module C informationValueUnit
Recycle, metal90
%
Recycle, plastic75
%
Disposal, metal10
%
Disposal, plastic5
%
Recovery, plastic 20
%
Transportation distance to the closest disposal area80
km
Means of transport16-32 tonne lorry (EURO 5), 50% load factor
N/A

Reference service life

Description of the default scenario in reference service lifeAccording to EN 17610:2022
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
30
year(s)

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module DBenefit
Brief description of the default scenario in module DBenefits beyond system boundaries - Potential for Reuse, Recovery and Recycling
Description of the default scenario in module DThis stage, according to the EN 15804:2012 + A2:2019 standard for the analysis "from cradle to gate, with modules C1-C4 and module D" , considers the benefit due to the reuse/recovery of materials. In this stage, the reuse of materials for recycling in stage C3 was considered.

Additional scenario 1

Name of the additional scenario100% recycling
Description of the additional scenarioScenario considers 100% of recycling at the end of life. Best-case for EoL scenario.

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Description of the additional scenario in module A4Transport to building

Module A5: Installation in the building

Description of the additional scenario in module A5Installation

Module C: End-of-life

Description of the additional scenario in module CThe demolition phase of the building site includes all deconstruction operations, including the initial dismantling and sorting on site of the handle. In the absence of primary data relating to the waste transport to the treatment plant, default data for modelling module were assumed according to relevant PCR 2019:14 2.0.1. A recycle ratio of 100% is considered for all parts of handle
Module C informationValueUnit
Recycle, metal100
%
Recycle, plastic100
%
Transportation distance to the closest disposal area100
km
Means of transport16-32 tonne lorry (EURO 5), 50% load factor
N/A

Reference service life

Description of the additional scenario in reference service lifeAccording to EN 17610:2022
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
30

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Description of the additional scenario in module DThis stage, according to the EN 15804:2012 + A2:2019 standard for the analysis "from cradle to gate, with modules C1-C4 and module D" , considers the benefit due to the reuse/recovery of materials. In this stage, the reuse of materials for recycling in stage C3 was considered.

Additional scenario 2

Name of the additional scenario100% landfill
Description of the additional scenarioScenario considers 100% of landfill at the end of life. This represents a worst-case scenario for end-of-life handling. The material is collected and transported to an inert landfill site without any further treatment

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Description of the additional scenario in module A4Transport to building

Module A5: Installation in the building

Description of the additional scenario in module A5Installation

Module C: End-of-life

Description of the additional scenario in module CThe demolition phase of the building site includes all deconstruction operations, including the initial dismantling and sorting on site of the handle. In the absence of primary data relating to the waste transport to the treatment plant, default data for modelling module were assumed according to relevant PCR 2019:14 2.0.1. A ratio of 100% to landfill is considered for all parts of handle
Module C informationValueUnit
Landfill, metal100
%
Landfill, plastic100
%
Transportation distance to the closest disposal area80
km
Means of transport16-32 tonne lorry (EURO 5), 50% load factor
N/A

Reference service life

Description of the additional scenario in reference service lifeAccording to EN 17610:2022
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
30
year(s)

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Description of the additional scenario in module DThis stage, according to the EN 15804:2012 + A2:2019 standard for the analysis "from cradle to gate, with modules C1-C4 and module D" , considers the benefit due to the reuse/recovery of materials. So in this scenario, the reuse of materials for recycling in stage C3 was not considered.

Environmental performance

The estimated impact results are only relative statements, which do not indicate the endpoints of the impact categories, exceeding threshold values, safety margins and/or risks.

Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.1.21E+18.09E-13.91E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.51E-23.57E-33.93E-3-5.48E+0
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.1.49E-12.33E-42.14E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.34E-62.52E-89.66E-6-2.23E-2
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.8.14E-23.93E-48.70E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+07.31E-61.02E-84.18E-6-1.48E-1
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.1.23E+18.09E-16.06E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.51E-23.57E-33.94E-3-5.65E+0
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.3.25E-71.76E-83.77E-11NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+03.28E-109.15E-134.49E-11-1.73E-7
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.8.71E-22.64E-31.53E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.91E-54.65E-72.49E-5-3.64E-2
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.6.50E-46.47E-62.56E-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.21E-74.70E-101.27E-7-3.11E-4
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg N eq.1.33E-28.96E-42.94E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.67E-52.22E-76.26E-6-3.97E-3
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.1.30E-19.58E-36.41E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.78E-42.40E-66.88E-5-4.31E-2
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.4.65E-23.94E-32.56E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+07.34E-55.98E-72.28E-5-1.97E-2
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADP-minerals&metals1kg Sb eq.8.93E-42.60E-63.34E-9NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.84E-87.44E-117.81E-96.99E-5
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossil1MJ, net calorific value1.61E+21.15E+11.90E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+02.14E-13.38E-45.56E-2-8.76E+1
Water useWDP1m3 world eq. deprived3.51E-14.67E-26.76E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+08.70E-49.96E-71.44E-33.85E-1
AcronymsGWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator

Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG1kg CO2 eq.1.23E+18.04E-16.13E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.50E-23.57E-33.92E-3-5.61E+0
AcronymsGWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.

Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Particulate matter emissionsPMDisease incidence7.04E-76.41E-81.46E-10NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.19E-92.44E-123.83E-10-4.32E-7
Ionizing radiation - human healthIRP1kBq U235 eq.4.41E-15.75E-31.64E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.07E-41.53E-79.34E-5-5.35E-1
Eco-toxicity - freshwaterETP-fw2CTUe2.33E+25.66E+09.27E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.05E-16.92E-48.23E-1-2.83E+0
Human toxicity - cancer effectsHTP-c2CTUh2.98E-83.67E-103.15E-12NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+06.84E-121.28E-133.50E-12-1.89E-8
Human toxicity - non-cancer effectsHTP-nc2CTUh6.30E-78.07E-91.68E-10NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.50E-105.44E-124.49E-11-1.50E-7
Land-use related impacts/soil qualitySQP2Dimensionless1.01E+26.83E+02.49E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.27E-19.47E-56.90E-2-1.48E+0
AcronymsPM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
Disclaimer 2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator.

Resource use indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
PEREMJ, net calorific value4.39E+11.78E-16.26E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+02.50E-35.31E-62.52E-3-3.79E+1
PERMMJ, net calorific value2.66E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PERTMJ, net calorific value4.65E+11.78E-16.26E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+02.50E-35.31E-62.52E-3-3.79E+1
PENREMJ, net calorific value1.61E+21.15E+11.90E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+02.14E-13.38E-45.56E-2-8.76E+1
PENRMMJ, net calorific value2.38E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PENRTMJ, net calorific value1.64E+21.15E+11.90E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+02.14E-13.38E-45.56E-2-8.76E+1
SMkg0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
RSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
NRSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
FWm31.06E-11.63E-32.29E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+03.04E-52.05E-74.16E-5-2.50E-1
AcronymsPERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Waste indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
HWDkg1.23E-27.30E-51.18E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.36E-64.56E-91.85E-76.51E-3
NHWDkg2.43E+05.60E-13.96E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.04E-23.48E-51.01E-1-1.73E+0
RWDkg3.12E-43.73E-61.04E-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+06.94E-89.92E-115.93E-8-4.32E-4
AcronymsHWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Output flow indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
CRUkg0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
MFRkg3.10E-10.00E+01.47E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+08.99E-10.00E+00.00E+0
MERkg3.10E-10.00E+03.56E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EEEMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EETMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsCRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4

Additional scenario100% recycling
Description of the scenario/methodBest-case for EoL scenario. In this scenario, it has been assumed that the whole ammount of recovered handle will be recycled withouth any losses or landfiling.
Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4
Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.1.21E+18.09E-13.91E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.51E-20.00E+00.00E+0-6.09E+0
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.1.49E-12.33E-42.14E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.34E-60.00E+00.00E+0-2.48E-2
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.8.14E-23.93E-48.70E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+07.31E-60.00E+00.00E+0-1.64E-1
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.1.23E+18.09E-16.06E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.51E-20.00E+00.00E+0-6.28E+0
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.3.25E-71.76E-83.77E-11NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+03.28E-100.00E+00.00E+0-1.92E-7
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.8.71E-22.64E-31.53E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.91E-50.00E+00.00E+0-4.05E-2
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.6.50E-46.47E-62.56E-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.21E-70.00E+00.00E+0-3.46E-4
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg P eq.1.33E-28.96E-42.94E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.67E-50.00E+00.00E+0-4.41E-3
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.1.30E-19.58E-36.41E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.78E-40.00E+00.00E+0-4.79E-2
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.4.65E-23.94E-32.56E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+07.34E-50.00E+00.00E+0-2.19E-2
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADPminerals& metalskg Sb eq.8.93E-42.60E-63.34E-9NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.84E-80.00E+00.00E+07.77E-5
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossilMJ, net calorific value1.61E+21.15E+11.90E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.84E-80.00E+00.00E+0-9.74E+1
Water useWDPm3 world eq. deprived3.51E-14.67E-26.76E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+08.70E-40.00E+00.00E+04.27E-1
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG(2)kg CO2 eq.1.23E+18.04E-16.13E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.50E-20.00E+00.00E+0-6.23E+0
AcronymsND - Not declared
DisclaimersDisclaimer 2 The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4

Additional scenario100% landfill
Description of the scenario/methodThis is the Worst-case EoL scenario. In this scenario, it has been assumed that the whole ammount of recovered handle will be landfiling withouth recycling.
Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4
Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.1.21E+18.09E-13.91E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.51E-20.00E+03.96E-20.00E+0
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.1.49E-12.33E-42.14E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.34E-60.00E+09.66E-50.00E+0
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.8.14E-23.93E-48.70E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+07.31E-60.00E+04.18E-50.00E+0
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.1.23E+18.09E-16.06E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.51E-20.00E+03.98E-20.00E+0
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.3.25E-71.76E-83.77E-11NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+03.28E-100.00E+04.50E-100.00E+0
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.8.71E-22.64E-31.53E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.91E-50.00E+02.49E-40.00E+0
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.6.50E-46.47E-62.56E-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.21E-70.00E+01.27E-60.00E+0
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg N eq.1.33E-28.96E-42.94E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.67E-50.00E+06.32E-50.00E+0
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.1.30E-19.58E-36.41E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.78E-40.00E+06.90E-40.00E+0
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.4.65E-23.94E-32.56E-52NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+07.34E-50.00E+02.29E-40.00E+0
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADPminerals& metalskg Sb eq.8.93E-42.60E-63.34E-9NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+04.84E-80.00E+07.82E-80.00E+0
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossilMJ, net calorific value1.61E+21.15E+11.90E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+02.14E-10.00E+05.57E-10.00E+0
Water useWDPm3 world eq. deprived3.51E-14.67E-26.76E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+08.70E-40.00E+01.45E-20.00E+0
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG(2)kg CO2 eq.1.23E+18.04E-16.13E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+01.50E-20.00E+03.95E-20.00E+0
AcronymsND - Not declared
DisclaimersDisclaimer 2 The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Additional environmental information

Main materials used to build the accessories are recyclable.

- It is recommended that accessories, packaging, etc. are disposed of accordingly, with local

disposal regulations and sent to a recycling unit for recovery and recycling

- Before sent to disposal it’s recommended to separate the materials as below:

Steel / Stainless Steel: Ferrous metals

Aluminium alloy / Zinc alloy: Non-ferrous metals

Plastic components (PA, PP, PE, POM, etc): Plastic wastes

The following section shows the variation of each impact indicator compared to the representative product for which the variation is above 10%, results aggregated over all included modules (from A to C)

impact Indicator abbreviation MAX MIN

GWP-luluc 20% 

AP 19%

ADPE -34%

ADPF 7% 

 WDP 167% -23%

Justification for why this is representativeRepresentative product # 03975 NP Ultra handle 005 (base painting) based on production volumes due to its highest annual production volume in the reference year.

Abbreviations

Global warming potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)

Acidification potential, accumulated exceedance (AP)

Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)

Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)

Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)

References

[1] UNI EN ISO 14040: 2021, Management environmental – Assessment of the life cycle – Principles and frame of reference.

[2] UNI EN ISO 14044: 2021, Management environmental – Evaluation of the life cycle– Requirements And guidelines .

[3] UNI EN ISO 14025:2010, Environmental labels and declarations - Type III environmental declarations - Principles and procedures

[4] UNI EN 15804:2012 + A2:2019, Sustainability from the constructions – Statements environmental Product – Key development rules for product category.

[5] General Program Instructions of the International EPD® System. Version 5.0

[6] PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (2.0.1), developed from IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, EPD International Secretariat

[7] c-PCR-020 Building hardware (EN 17610) ( version 2024-04-30).

[8] c-PCR007 Windows and Doors (EN 17213:2020) version 2024-04-30

[9] EN 17610:2022 Building hardware - Environmental product declarations - Product category rules complementary to EN 15804 for building hardware

[10] Eurostat Treatment of waste by waste category, hazardousness and waste management operations. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/product/view/env_wastrt?category=env.env_was.env_wasgt

Version history

original version of the EPD