EPD-IES-0023901:002

Steel fiber, with copper plating

This steel fiber product, manufactured by Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd., is specifically engineered for high-performance concrete reinforcement. Composed entirely of non-biogenic materials, its material composition consists of 97.09% steel wire rod, 0.15% copper plating, and 2.76% auxiliary components. The product is designed to significantly improve the fatigue, shear, bending, and impact strength of concrete, while substantially increasing its crack resistance, durability, and toughness.

General information

EPD OwnerTianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., LTD
Registration numberEPD-IES-0023901:002
EPD typeEPD of a single product from a manufacturer/service provider
StatusValid
Version date2026-06-15
Validity date2031-06-15
Standards conformanceISO 14025:2006, EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021
Geographical scopeChina
An EPD may be updated or depublished if conditions change. This is the latest version of the EPD.

Programme information

ProgrammeInternational EPD System
AddressEPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden
Websitewww.environdec.com
E-mailsupport@environdec.com

Product category rules

CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR)
Product Category Rules (PCR)2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (version 2.0.1) 2.0.1
PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Rob Rouwette (chair), Noa Meron (co-chair). The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support.

Verification

Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via
Third-party verifierAndreas Ciroth (GreenDelta GmbH)
Approved byThe International EPD® System
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.environdec.com.

Ownership and limitation on use of EPD

Limitations

EPDs within the same product category but published in different EPD programmes, may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same first-digit version number) or be based on fully aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have identical scope in terms of included life-cycle stages (unless the excluded life-cycle stage is demonstrated to be insignificant); apply identical impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); and be valid at the time of comparison.

Ownership

The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.

Information about EPD Owner

EPD OwnerTianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., LTD
Contact person nameZhang Yixuan
Contact person e-mailEPD@hffibers.com
Organisation addressHigh-grade metal products industrial park, Shuangtang town, Jinghai district, Tianjin, P.R. China. 301600 Tianjin China
LCA PractitionerCHEN CAO, caochen@lheia.com chen shen, shenchen@lheia.com Chenxing Zhang, zhang.chenxing@foxmail.com yenan tu, m15527105413@163.com

Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner

Established in 2004 and headquartered in Tianjin, Tianjin Hengfeng Xuxiang New Materials Co., Ltd. operates one central hub and four manufacturing facilities, complemented by a wholly-owned subsidiary in Guangzhou. This strategic layout enables us to deliver real-time support and rapid responses to clients worldwide. Backed by total assets of RMB 300 million, the company generates an annual industrial output value of RMB 1 billion. Our team comprises over 450 professionals, including more than 20 intermediate and senior experts. Furthermore, we have co-founded a concrete laboratory with Hebei University of Technology (a national "211" university) to advance research on the performance and application of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC). Hengfeng is deeply committed to industry advancement and standardization. We actively contributed to the formulation of the national standard Design Standard for Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Structures (JGJ/T 465-2019). Through participation in domestic and international academic conferences, we continuously promote technological innovation and product R&D. Additionally, our presence at global exhibitions reflects our dedication to direct client engagement and our relentless pursuit of superior service for both domestic and international markets. With an annual production capacity of 65,000 tons, Hengfeng offers a comprehensive range of steel fiber products, including end-hook, galvanized, specially coated, copper-plated micro-wire, special-shaped, and custom-engineered fibers tailored to specific customer requirements, ensuring optimal solutions for diverse engineering applications.

Organisation logo

Product information

Product nameSteel fiber, with copper plating
Product identificationSteel fiber, with copper plating
Product descriptionThis steel fiber product, manufactured by Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd., is specifically engineered for high-performance concrete reinforcement. Composed entirely of non-biogenic materials, its material composition consists of 97.09% steel wire rod, 0.15% copper plating, and 2.76% auxiliary components. The product is designed to significantly improve the fatigue, shear, bending, and impact strength of concrete, while substantially increasing its crack resistance, durability, and toughness.
Product information from external sourceshttp://shushiya.web.qfxwl.com/shushiya/products/28510407_0_0_1.html
Technical purpose of productThis steel fiber product is used to improve the fatigue strength, shear strength, bending strength, and impact resistance of concrete, as well as to increase the crack resistance, durability, and toughness of concrete.
Manufacturing or service provision descriptionThe production process begins with steel wire rod as the raw material. The material first undergoes dry wire drawing to reduce the wire diameter. Subsequently, the wire is subjected to copper plating to improve surface characteristics and performance. After plating, the wire undergoes a second wire drawing process (wet drawing) to achieve the required dimensions and mechanical properties. The processed wire is then treated through glue coating and drying. Following this, the product proceeds to sizing and cutting according to specification requirements, after which testing is conducted to ensure product quality and compliance. Finally, qualified products are sent for packaging before shipment.
Material propertiesVolumetric mass density: 7850 kg/m3
Volumetric mass density:
7850 kg/m3
Manufacturing siteTianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd. Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd High-grade metal products industrial park, Shuangtang town, Jinghai district, Tianjin, P.R. China. 301600 Tianjin China
UN CPC code42190. Other structures (except prefabricated buildings) and parts of structures, of iron, steel or aluminium; plates, rods, angles, shapes, sections, profiles, tubes and the like, prepared for use in structures, of iron, steel or aluminium; props and similar eq
Geographical scopeChina

Product images

Technical characteristics and performance

Technical performance

Product nameNominal DiameterNominal LengthTensile StrengthType categoryType categoryType categoryType categoryType categoryType categoryType categoryType category
Steel fiber, with copper plating0.12-1.2 mm6-60 mm1800-3600 MPa

Content declaration

Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Steel wire rod0.9709000
Copper0.0015000
Others0.0276000
Total1000
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2
Packaging materials
Material nameMass, kgMass-% (versus the product)Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
PE0.00490.490
Wooden pallet0.01151.150.00542
Cardboard0.00280.280.00197
Total0.01921.920.00739
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

LCA information

EPD based on declared or functional unitDeclared unit
Declared unit and reference flowSteel fiber, with copper plating Mass: 1 kg
Conversion factor to mass1
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes?
Datasources used for this EPDecoinvent database (general) ecoinvent 3.11 database
LCA SoftwareOpenLCA 2.6.0
Additional information about the underlying LCA-based information

Allocation Procedures:

  • Where allocation was necessary, the procedures followed the principles outlined in EN 15804 and ISO 14044. The allocation of inputs and outputs follows the principle of direct assignment wherever possible. Electricity consumption and specific chemical usage (e.g., hydrochloric acid, adhesives) are independently monitored and recorded for the copper-plated and non-copper-plated steel fiber production lines. These inputs were directly assigned to their respective production lines and then calculated per kilogram of product based on the specific annual production mass of each line.
  • However, facility-level shared resources lacking individual sub-metering, specifically total fresh water consumption, could not be sub-divided by production line. Therefore, the annual facility water use was allocated across all steel fiber products (both copper-plated and non-copper-plated) based on their combined total mass produced during the reference year.

Impact Assessment Method:

The Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) was performed using characterization factors and methods compliant with EN 15804:2012+A2:2019. Specifically, the calculations were carried out in OpenLCA 2.6.1, applying the 'EN 15804+A2 Method' provided within the software, which implements the mandatory indicators and characterization models referenced by the standard.

  • Time Horizon: The assessment adheres to a 100-year time horizon for all impact categories, meaning any potential emissions occurring after 100 years are excluded from the calculation, as required by the standard.
  • GWP Characterization Factors: The characterization factors for calculating the Global Warming Potential (GWP) are based on the values published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), released in 2021.

Exclusions:

  • The system boundary for this study is "cradle-to-grave" and covers the product stage (A1-A5), end-of-life stage (C1-C4), and potential benefits beyond the system boundary (D), in accordance with EN 15804 and PCR 2019:14. Certain life cycle stages are excluded based on standard-defined scoping rules:
  • Use Phase (Modules B1-B7): The declared products are intermediate construction products. Their environmental performance during the use phase (e.g., maintenance, repair, operational use) is dependent on the specific building or construction work in which they are installed. As these factors are outside the control of the manufacturer and a single representative use scenario cannot be defined, modules B1-B7 are excluded from the scope as a scoping decision. This is a standard approach for business-to-business EPDs of this product type, with any use-phase impacts being assessed at the building level.
  • Infrastructure and Capital Goods: The production and end-of-life of capital goods, such as the manufacturing plant, machinery, and other infrastructure, are also excluded from the system boundary. As specified in EN 15804, the environmental impacts of these items, when allocated to a single functional unit of the product, are considered to be negligible over the lifespan of the infrastructure.

Cut-off Criteria:

  • A comprehensive data collection process was undertaken for this assessment. All major raw materials and auxiliary materials were included in the model, thereby meeting and exceeding the requirement that a minimum of 95% of total inflows (mass and energy) and environmental impacts per module are included.
  • All inputs and outputs for which data are available shall be included. Minor material or energy flows may be omitted if they are less than 1% of the total mass or energy, provided that the sum of all omitted flows does not exceed 5%.
Version of the EN 15804 reference packageEF Reference Package 3.1
Characterisation methodsEN 15804:2012+A2:2019(EF3.1)
Technology description including background systemThe declared products, manufactured by Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd. (China), are steel fibers used to significantly enhance the mechanical strength, durability, and crack resistance of concrete. Manufacturing relies on a mechanical wire processing system utilizing steel wire rod. For copper-plated fibers, the typical production route incorporates electrolytic plating: Steel wire rod → First wire drawing (dry) → Copper plating → Second wire drawing (wet) → Glue coating and drying → Sizing and cutting → Testing → Packaging. This specific surface treatment requires chemical auxiliaries, including hydrochloric acid, copper sulfate electrolytes, and cleaning agents. The foreground system (A1–A3) is modeled using site-specific primary data (encompassing raw materials, energy, waste, and logistics) collected for the 2025 reporting year. Electricity consumption in module A3 reflects the company-specific 2025 mix: 43.74% renewable energy (purchased wind/solar and on-site photovoltaic) and 56.26% local grid electricity. The background system utilizes Ecoinvent 3.11 datasets and supplier-specific EPDs (CISA-EPD-LSHH-20250076 and CISA-EPD-XHYJ-20260015) for upstream steel wire rod production. Transportation is modeled via road freight using actual logistics data. End-of-life and recycling processes follow the EN 15804+A2 net scrap approach, reflecting representative Chinese market practices. The model ensures high geographical and technological representativeness for the actual manufacturing conditions in 2025.
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution levelLess than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs

Data quality assessment

Description of data quality assessment and reference yearsPrimary Data: - The product's material consumption data are sourced directly from the company's verified Bill of Materials (BOM). - Raw material (Steel Wire Rod) procurement and transportation data (including distances and transport modes) are retrieved from the actual logistics and sales statistics of Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd. for the year 2025. - The environmental impact data for the raw material (Steel Wire Rod) is adopted directly from verified, supplier-specific Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), specifically CISA-EPD-LSHH-20250076 and CISA-EPD-XHYJ-20260015. This specific dataset qualifies as primary-grade specific data for the assessment. - Energy and resource consumption data during the manufacturing process are obtained from the actual utility meter records of Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd., covering the temporal scope from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025.
Data quality assessment
Process nameSource typeSourceReference yearData categoryShare of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3
Production of raw material (Steel Wire Rod)EPDSupplier EPD2025Primary data54.04%
Transportation of raw material (Steel Wire Rod)Collected dataEPD Owner2025Primary data2.83%
Manufacturing of steel fiber Collected data EPD Owner2025 Primary data12.57%
Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A369.44%
The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that supports the use of more primary data to increase the representativeness of and comparability between EPDs. Note that the indicator does not capture all relevant aspects of data quality and is not comparable across product categories.
Electricity data
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 (A5 for services)
Type of electricity mixSpecific electricity mix as generated, or purchased from an electricity supplier, demonstrated by a contractual instrument
Energy sourcesHydro0%
Wind17.59%
Solar26.15%
Biomass0%
Geothermal0%
Waste0%
Nuclear0%
Natural gas0%
Coal0%
Oil0%
Peat0%
Other56.26%
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh)0.54 kg CO2 eq./kWh
Method used to calculate residual electricity mixThe electricity model for the A3 module is based on the Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd.’s specific energy mix in 2025: - Renewable Energy (43.74%): including purchased wind power (17.59%, 7,203.655 MWh), purchased solar power (11.32%, 4,661.860 MWh), and on-site self-generated solar power (14.83%, 6,107.80 MWh). - Local Grid Electricity (56.26%): Sourced from the local power grid. Since an official Residual Grid Mix is not available for China, the generic Chinese national grid mix from Ecoinvent 3.11 was applied for the remaining 56.26% of local grid electricity, which is an accepted proxy under current guidelines.

System boundary

Description of the system boundaryb) Cradle to gate with options, modules C1-C4, module D and with optional modules (A1-A3 + C + D and additional modules).
Excluded modulesYes, there is an excluded module, or there are excluded modules
Justification for the omission of modulesUse Phase (Modules B1-B7) are excluded. As intermediate construction products, their use-phase environmental performance depends entirely on the specific building context. Since these conditions are beyond the manufacturer's control and a single representative scenario cannot be defined, modules B1-B7 are excluded. This aligns with standard B2B EPD practices, where use-phase impacts are assessed at the building level.

Declared modules

Product stageConstruction process stageUse stageEnd of life stageBeyond product life cycle
Raw material supplyTransportManufacturingTransport to siteConstruction installationUseMaintenanceRepairReplacementRefurbishmentOperational energy useOperational water useDe-construction demolitionTransportWaste processingDisposalReuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential
ModuleA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Modules declaredXXXXXNDNDNDNDNDNDNDXXXXX
GeographyChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AChinaChinaChinaChinaChina
Share of specific data42.03%--------------
Variation - products5%--------------
Variation - sites0%--------------
DisclaimerThe share of specific/primary data and both variations (products and sites) refer to GWP-GHG results only.

Process flow diagram(s) related images

Default scenario

Name of the default scenarioDefault scenario
Description of the default scenarioModule A1 Raw Material: This module includes the extraction, processing, and manufacturing of raw materials (mainly steel wire rod). This supplier-specific data is used. The specific EPDs referenced for this upstream raw material data are CISA-EPD-LSHH-20250076 and CISA-EPD-XHYJ-20260015. Module A2 Transport to Tianjin HengfengXuxiang: This module accounts for the domestic transportation of raw materials from suppliers to Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd.’s facility within China. The primary transport mode is road freight using Euro 6 diesel trucks (16-32t). Based on actual procurement and logistics data, a representative transport distance of 440 km was determined. Module A3 Manufacturing: This module covers all activities at Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd.’s facility, including energy consumption (electricity), water usage, auxiliary chemicals and adhesives usage, plus waste generation during the production. In terms of waste disposal, the waste generated during the production consists mainly of wastewater, liquid waste, sludge and small amounts of scrap metal (debris separated during mechanical processing). Among them, the scrap metal, due to their very small quantity, will not enter the recycling process, so they are sent to landfill as garbage in factory daily practice (module D will not include this part of the data).

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A4Transport to customer
Brief description of the default scenario in module A4Domestic transportation of steel fibers
Description of the default scenario in module A4Module A4 Transport to customers' construction sites: This module accounts for the domestic transportation of steel fiber products from the factory to various construction sites within China. The primary transport mode is road freight using Euro 6 diesel trucks (16-32t, full-load conditions). Based on the actual logistics and sales data of Tianjin HengfengXuxiang New Material Co., Ltd. from 2025, a representative transport distance of 50 km was determined.
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
50
km
TruckDiesel, EURO 6, 16-32t, full-load
N/A

Module A5: Installation in the building

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A5On-site installation
Brief description of the default scenario in module A5On-site mixing of steel fibers into concrete
Description of the default scenario in module A5Module A5 On-site installation: This module represents for the installation of steel fiber products at construction sites within China, focusing on on-site mixing into concrete. Environmental impacts primarily consider localized particulate matter emissions (PM10/dust) generated during mixing. Additionally, it covers the end-of-life management of packaging waste (PE film, cardboard, and wooden pallets) from product delivery, modeled using representative Chinese market waste disposal scenarios.
Module A5 informationValueUnit
Net fresh water consumption during installation
0
m3
Waste paper for disposal0.0028
kg
Waste wooden pallet for disposal0.0115
kg
Waste PE for disposal0.0049
kg
Direct emissions to air-dust0.0041
kg

Module C: End-of-life

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module CEnd-of-life
Brief description of the default scenario in module CDomestic demolition, transport, recycling and final landfill of steel fibers
Description of the default scenario in module CModule C: This module accounts for the end-of-life (EOL) stage of steel fibers embedded in concrete structures within China. It encompasses deconstruction and dismantling (C1), transportation to waste processing facilities (C2), waste processing for recycling (C3), and final disposal (C4). For C1 (Deconstruction): All energy inputs required for onsite dismantling activities (such as the operation of electric breakers and cutting tools during the demolition) were consolidated into an equivalent electricity consumption dataset. For C2 (Transport to waste processing): The primary transport mode for recovered materials is modeled via road freight using Euro 6 diesel trucks (16-32t, full-load conditions) over a representative regional distance of 50 km. For C3 (Waste processing): A 50% recovery rate is applied for sorting and purification processes, reflecting typical Chinese construction and demolition waste management practices. Thus, 0.5 kg of useful secondary raw materials are recovered. For C4 (Disposal): The remaining 50% fraction, unrecoverable due to technical separation limitations, is directed to local landfill disposal. This module also encompasses a short-distance localized transport of 5 km to the landfill site, utilizing the same Euro 6 diesel truck specification (16-32t, full-load conditions).
Module C informationValueUnit
Collection process, specified by type – collected separately0
kg
Collection process, specified by type – collected with mixed construction waste1.0
kg
Recovery system, specified by type – for re-use0
kg
Recovery system, specified by type – for recycling0.5
kg
Recovery system, specified by type – for energy recovery0
kg
Disposal, specified by type – final deposition0.5
kg
Further assumptions for scenario developmentRepresentative Chinese CDW scenario; 50% recycling rate
N/A

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module DRecycling
Brief description of the default scenario in module DRecycling of recovered steel fibers
Description of the default scenario in module DModule D Recycling: This module evaluates the potential net environmental benefits beyond the system boundary using the "Net Scrap" approach defined in EN 15804+A2. Based on Module C3, 0.5 kg of useful secondary raw materials are recovered and sorted for recycling. Then a technical processing efficiency of 90% is assumed for the re-melting stage, meaning 0.45 kg of the collected scrap successfully enters the high-frequency furnace. After accounting for a 2% melting and refining loss within the furnace, the process yields 0.441 kg of finished secondary steel products (specifically, hot-rolled low-alloyed steel). In line with EN 15804+A2, the net output flow used for credit calculation is determined at the system boundary exit (i.e., the scrap leaving C3 as secondary raw material, 0.5 kg). And net scrap = 0.5 kg - 0.188 kg (SM, Use of secondary materials in A1) = 0.312 kg.
Module D informationValueUnit
Net scrap0.312
kg
Technical processing efficiency90
%
Melting and refining loss within the furnace2
%

Environmental performance

The estimated impact results are only relative statements, which do not indicate the endpoints of the impact categories, exceeding threshold values, safety margins and/or risks.

Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.1.27E+05.45E-32.95E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.54E-35.36E-34.29E-23.40E-3-9.04E-1
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.1.29E+05.45E-32.40E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.54E-35.36E-34.29E-23.40E-3-9.03E-1
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.-2.71E-20.00E+02.71E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.3.55E-32.57E-61.20E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.73E-62.52E-61.89E-51.90E-6-6.20E-4
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.1.02E-88.05E-114.16E-12NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.31E-117.91E-111.50E-109.11E-11-3.03E-9
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.6.73E-31.44E-57.02E-6NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.20E-51.42E-52.60E-42.26E-5-3.89E-3
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.1.81E-46.84E-84.63E-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.90E-76.72E-81.35E-63.40E-8-3.93E-5
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg N eq.2.75E-33.51E-68.74E-6NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.03E-53.44E-65.26E-58.53E-6-7.60E-4
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.3.03E-23.91E-53.46E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.10E-43.84E-55.70E-49.38E-5-9.12E-3
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.2.83E-32.11E-51.82E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.00E-52.08E-51.50E-43.42E-5-3.19E-3
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADP-minerals&metals1kg Sb eq.4.17E-51.60E-88.55E-10NDNDNDNDNDNDND4.08E-81.58E-82.05E-75.47E-9-6.76E-6
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossil1MJ, net calorific value1.65E+18.09E-24.06E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.14E-27.95E-24.60E-18.06E-2-1.00E+1
Water useWDP1m3 world eq. deprived1.34E+04.80E-41.70E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.16E-34.70E-47.15E-33.39E-3-4.27E-1
AcronymsGWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator

Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG1kg CO2 eq.1.32E+05.46E-31.89E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.54E-35.36E-34.29E-23.40E-3-8.47E-1
AcronymsGWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.

Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Particulate matter emissionsPMDisease incidence2.70E-75.21E-104.28E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.02E-105.12E-103.52E-95.29E-10-8.20E-8
Ionizing radiation - human healthIRP1kBq U235 eq.3.71E-22.70E-51.32E-6NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.30E-42.65E-56.70E-41.91E-5-1.20E-2
Eco-toxicity - freshwaterETP-fw2CTUe2.01E+11.31E-25.19E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.71E-21.29E-21.64E-16.19E-3-3.74E+0
Human toxicity - cancer effectsHTP-c2CTUh3.65E-98.99E-131.44E-11NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.14E-128.84E-135.86E-126.12E-13-1.10E-9
Human toxicity - non-cancer effectsHTP-nc2CTUh8.01E-85.16E-111.50E-9NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.58E-115.07E-113.88E-101.53E-11-1.59E-8
Land-use related impacts/soil qualitySQP2Dimensionless1.75E+18.01E-21.19E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.21E-27.87E-21.11E-11.54E-1-3.03E+0
AcronymsPM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
Disclaimer 2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator.

Resource use indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
PEREMJ, net calorific value3.87E+01.12E-36.00E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.20E-21.10E-36.03E-27.70E-4-9.69E-1
PERMMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PERTMJ, net calorific value3.87E+01.12E-36.00E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.20E-21.10E-36.03E-27.70E-4-9.69E-1
PENREMJ, net calorific value1.69E+18.09E-24.06E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.14E-27.95E-24.60E-18.06E-2-1.00E+1
PENRMMJ, net calorific value1.12E-10.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PENRTMJ, net calorific value1.70E+18.09E-24.06E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.14E-27.95E-24.60E-18.06E-2-1.00E+1
SMkg1.88E-10.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
RSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
NRSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
FWm31.00E-21.21E-51.53E-6NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.72E-51.19E-51.70E-47.98E-5-6.21E-3
AcronymsPERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Waste indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
HWDkg4.01E-21.30E-42.77E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.00E-41.30E-43.51E-36.83E-5-3.29E-1
NHWDkg3.62E-17.20E-41.80E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.30E-47.10E-45.65E-25.00E-1-2.74E-2
RWDkg4.52E-61.70E-88.38E-10NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.02E-71.67E-85.12E-71.20E-8-7.86E-6
AcronymsHWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Output flow indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
CRUkg0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
MFRkg0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+05.00E-10.00E+00.00E+0
MERkg0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EEEMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EETMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsCRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Abbreviations

Not applicable

References

  • General Programme Instructions of the International EPD® System. Version 5.0.1
  • PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (version 2.0.1)
  • EN 15804:2012+A2:2019. Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations
  • ISO 14025:2006. Environmental labels and declarations — Type III environmental declarations —Principles and procedures
  • ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework
  • ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines
  • LCA software OpenLCA 2.6.1
  • EPD report CISA-EPD-LSHH-20250076 from EPD Programme for China Steel Industry Chain [valid until: 2028-10-21]
  • EPD report CISA-EPD-XHYJ-20260015 from EPD Programme for China Steel Industry Chain [valid until: 2029-02-10]
  • World Steel Association (2020). Life cycle inventory methodology report for steel products. Brussels.

Version history

Version 001, 2026-06-15

  • Original version of the EPD

Version 002, 2026-06-22

  • 2nd version of the EPD, with a few misspellings revised