EPDM Sealing Profile
General information
EPD Owner | Arslan Dış Ticaret Sanayi A.Ş. |
---|---|
Registration number | EPD-IES-0019800:003 |
PCR | 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) 1.3.4 |
Status | Valid |
Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
Valid until | 2030-04-30 |
EN 15804 compliant | Yes |
Geographical scope | Global |
Product images
Programme information
Programme | International EPD System |
---|---|
Address | EPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden |
Website | www.environdec.com |
support@environdec.com |
Product category rules
CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR) | |
Product Category Rules (PCR) | 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) 1.3.4 |
---|---|
PCR review was conducted by | The Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Claudia A. Peña, University of Concepción, Chile. The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support. |
Verification
LCA accountability | burcu@ankadanismanlikltd.com, burcu@ankadanismanlikltd.com, Arslan Dış Ticaret Sanayi A.Ş. |
---|---|
Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via | |
Third-party verifier | Vladimír Kocí (LCAstudio) |
Approved by | International EPD System |
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier | |
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.envrondec.com. |
Ownership and limitation on use of EPD
Limitations
EPDs within the same product category but registered in different EPD programmes may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same version number up to the first two digits) or be based on fully-aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have equivalent system boundaries and descriptions of data; apply equivalent data quality requirements, methods of data collection, and allocation methods; apply identical cut-off rules and impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); have equivalent content declarations; and be valid at the time of comparison.
Ownership
The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.
Information about EPD Owner
EPD Owner | Arslan Dış Ticaret Sanayi A.Ş. |
---|---|
Contact person name | İbrahim Arslan |
Contact person e-mail | ibrahimarslan@arline.com.tr |
Organisation address | Turkey İzmir 35860 Yazibasi Mah Izmir Aydin Caddesi D. No : 18/1, 35875 Torbali |
Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner
The ARLINE COMPOSITE brand has been structured and developed by Arslan Dış Tic. A.Ş., a subsidiary of Arslan Motor, which has been active in the agricultural, forestry and garden machinery sector since its establishment in 1974. A.Ş., which has been active in the agricultural, forest and garden machinery sector since its establishment in 1974. ARLINE was designed to contribute to the country's economy and employment by producing all of its composite wood products with its own R&D and patents, all of which are domestic products. Both Arslan Motor and Arslan Dış Tic. A.Ş., both Arslan Motor and Arslan Dış Tic. A.Ş. carry out their production and sales principles with the awareness that the increase in the number of users, with whom they have been working together for years, is based on providing accurate, reliable, high quality products and meeting diversified customer needs through continuous development. ARLINE aims to add maximum benefit and value to the areas of use with the high quality achieved by the unique design and formulation of the Wood Plastic Composite products and EPDM rubber it produces in an area of 23.000m2 in line with experience of more than 48 years and the trust it has establish with its customers. Arline has been exports 98% of its production and 85% of this amount is exported to European Countries expecially to the Germany , Austria , Spain and Balkan Countries. Başlıca Müşteriler: F.W. Barth & Co. GmbH- Brand Name: TRENGARD (Germany), Walltec A/S-Brand Name: WALLTEC (Denmark)
Organisation logo
Product information
Product name | EPDM Sealing Profile |
---|---|
Product identification | EPDM Sealing Profiles, typically used in the construction industries for sealing, insulation, and weatherproofing applications. The profiles are made of ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) rubber and are available in various cross-sectional shapes and dimensions depending on the application. The product can be identified by its material composition (EPDM), function (sealing profile), and relevant product codes or catalog numbers provided by the manufacturer. |
Product description | The EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer) sealing profile is a durable and flexible rubber component used primarily in industrial, construction, automotive, and building applications to provide weather resistance, sound insulation, and dust sealing. Manufactured through extrusion, it offers excellent resistance to UV radiation, ozone, temperature variations, and aging, making it ideal for both indoor and outdoor environments. The product can be custom-shaped and is typically used in doors, windows, facades, and machinery to ensure long-lasting sealing performance. |
Technical purpose of product | Products are mostly used in the construction industry. |
Manufacturing or service provision description | Rubber extrusion is a downstream process that includes several stages: compounding, heating, kneading, pressurizing, extrusion. This process utilizes rubber and chemical feedstocks derived from various primary operations in the chemical and petrochemical industries. Rubber extrusion, while fundamentally straightforward, involves several detailed steps. The basic process includes feeding rubber material into the extruder, collecting the extrudate, and then cutting and splicing it to meet the client’s specifications. However, successful extrusion depends on managing numerous parameters, such as the formulation of the rubber compound, extruding conditions (including temperature and throughput rate). Precise control of these factors is essential to produce a consistent and reliable product. Products are mostly used in the construction industry. |
Material properties | Area density: 1 kg/m2 |
Production site | İzmir Factory Turkey İzmir 35860 Yazibasi Mah Izmir Aydin Caddesi D. No : 18/1, 35875 Torbali |
UN CPC code | 37990. Non-metallic mineral products n.e.c. (including mineral wool, expanded mineral materials, worked mica, articles of mica, non-electrical articles of graphite or other carbon and articles of peat) |
Geographical scope | Global |
Technical characteristics and performance
Technical performance
Product name | MATERIAL TYPE | MATERIAL CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTIC / ADVANTAGES | COLOR | WORKING TEMPERATURE RANGE | STANDARDS/REGULATION |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPDM SEALING PROFILES | EPDM RUBBER (ETHYLENE PROPILENE DIENE MOMOMER) | Good UV stability, High elasticity and low permanent deformation, | BLACK | (-)40 °C TO 120 °C | Defined customer requirement / International or national standards |
Content declaration
Hazardous and toxic substances | The product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight. |
---|
Content name | Weight, kg | Post-consumer recycled material, weight-% of product | Biogenic material, weight-% of product | Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit |
---|---|---|---|---|
EPDM (Etilen Propilen Dien Monomer) | 0.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PE Polietilen (Recycled) | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Calcium Carbonate | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ZN Stread + CN Stread | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carbon Black | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 1.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note 1 | 1 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2 |
Material name | Weight, kg | Weight-% (versus the product) | Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit |
---|---|---|---|
Wooden pallet | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.99 |
Clear polyethylene cover | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
Total | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1 |
Note 1 | 1 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2 |
LCA information
EPD based on declared or functional unit | Declared unit |
---|---|
Declared unit and reference flow | 1 m2 of EPDM Sealing Profiles Area: 1 m2 |
Conversion factor to mass | 1.46 |
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes? | |
Datasources used for this EPD | ecoinvent database (general) ecoinvent 3.10 database |
LCA Software | SimaPro SimaPro 9.6 |
Version of the EN 15804 reference package | EF Reference Package 3.1 |
Technology description including background system | The EPDM sealing profiles are produced through extrusion technology. In this process, EPDM compound — composed of synthetic rubber, fillers, oils, and additives — is fed into an extruder, shaped through a die to the desired profile geometry, and then vulcanized (crosslinked) using hot air, microwave, or infrared curing systems. The vulcanized profiles are cut to length, optionally coated, and packed for shipment. The background system includes upstream processes such as the extraction and processing of raw materials (EPDM rubber, carbon black, plasticizers, and other additives), electricity and thermal energy used in extrusion and vulcanization, packaging materials, and transportation to the factory. All background data used in this EPD are based on generic datasets obtained from the ecoinvent database (version 3.10) and are modeled using system boundaries defined by EN 15804+A2. |
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution level | Less than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs |
Data quality assessment and reference years
Description of data quality assessment and reference years | 01.01.2024-31.12.2024 |
---|
Process name | Source type | Source | Reference year | Data category | Share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manufacturing of Product | Database | EPD Owner | Jan 1 202 - Dec 31 202 | Primary Data | 90% |
Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3 | 90% | ||||
The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that do not capture all relevant aspects of data quality. The indicator is not comparable across product categories. |
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 | ||
---|---|---|
Type of electricity mix | Residual electricity mix on the market | |
Energy sources | Hydro | 0% |
Wind | 0% | |
Solar | 80% | |
Biomass | 0% | |
Geothermal | 0% | |
Waste | 0% | |
Nuclear | 0% | |
Natural gas | 0% | |
Coal | 0% | |
Oil | 0% | |
Peat | 0% | |
Other | 20% | |
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh) | 0.02 kg CO2 eq./kWh |
System boundary
Description of the system boundary | a) Cradle to gate with modules C1-C4 and module D (A1-A3 + C + D). |
---|---|
Excluded modules | Yes, there is an excluded module, or there are excluded modules |
Justification for the omission of modules | Use phase has been excluded |
Declared modules
Product stage | Construction process stage | Use stage | End of life stage | Beyond product life cycle | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raw material supply | Transport | Manufacturing | Transport to site | Construction installation | Use | Maintenance | Repair | Replacement | Refurbishment | Operational energy use | Operational water use | De-construction demolition | Transport | Waste processing | Disposal | Reuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential | |
Module | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
Modules declared | X | X | X | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | X | X | X | X | X |
Geography | Global | Global | Global | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Global | Global | Global | Global | Global |
Share of specific data | 90% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Variation - products | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Variation - sites | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Process flow diagram(s) related images
Default scenario
Name of the default scenario | Landfill and incineration with energy recovery in a European waste management system |
---|---|
Description of the default scenario | Collection and dismantling of used EPDM sealing profiles at the end of life. |
Module C: End-of-life
Explanatory name of the default scenario in module C | Landfill |
---|---|
Brief description of the default scenario in module C | Landfill Senario |
Description of the default scenario in module C | C1: This stage includes the impacts during the dismantling/demolition of EPDM Sealing Profiles after its end-of-life. It has been assumed that the product can be uninstalled manually by using hand-cutting tools. |
Module C information | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
Collection (mixed waste) | 0,99 | kg CO2 eq. |
Collection (separately) | 0 | N/A |
Recovery (re-use) | 0 | N/A |
Recovery (recycling) | 0,9405 | kg CO2 eq. |
Recovery (energy recovery) | 0 | |
Disposal (landfill) | 0,0595 | kg CO2 eq. |
(transportation: 100 km | 100 | kg CO2 eq. |
Module D: Beyond product life cycle
Explanatory name of the default scenario in module D | Avoided burden |
---|---|
Brief description of the default scenario in module D | 94.05% of product is recycled and substitutes virgin EPDM or fillers |
Description of the default scenario in module D | Module D: After the end-of-life stage, approximately 94.05% of the EPDM Sealing Profile product is recovered and recycled. The recycled EPDM granulate is assumed to substitute virgin EPDM or mineral fillers used in construction applications. Environmental benefits associated with the avoided production of these materials are accounted for in Module D. This closed-loop recycling scenario helps reduce overall environmental impacts by displacing raw material production and related emissions. |
Module D information | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
Substituted material – Virgin EPDM | 0.9405 | kg CO2 eq. |
Environmental performance
Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804
Impact category | Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Climate change - total | GWP-total | kg CO2 eq. | 3.11E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.04E-2 | 2.09E-1 | 2.97E+0 | -1.15E-1 |
Climate change - fossil | GWP-fossil | kg CO2 eq. | 2.14E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.04E-2 | 2.06E-1 | 2.03E-1 | -1.17E-1 |
Climate change - biogenic | GWP-biogenic | kg CO2 eq. | 9.58E-1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 4.39E-7 | 2.00E-3 | 2.77E+0 | 2.11E-3 |
Climate change - land use and land-use change | GWP-luluc | kg CO2 eq. | 3.83E-3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 4.34E-6 | 1.55E-3 | 5.70E-5 | -9.03E-5 |
Ozone depletion | ODP | kg CFC-11 eq. | 1.04E-7 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.67E-10 | 4.74E-9 | 1.36E-9 | -3.90E-9 |
Acidification | AP | mol H+ eq. | 1.32E-2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 2.65E-5 | 1.40E-3 | 6.83E-4 | -4.69E-4 |
Eutrophication aquatic freshwater | EP-freshwater | kg P eq. | 8.19E-4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 8.42E-7 | 1.78E-4 | 3.04E-4 | -2.54E-5 |
Eutrophication aquatic marine | EP-marine | kg N eq. | 2.80E-3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 6.72E-6 | 2.35E-4 | 5.71E-3 | -1.01E-4 |
Eutrophication terrestrial | EP-terrestrial | mol N eq. | 2.76E-2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 7.28E-5 | 2.25E-3 | 2.12E-3 | -1.00E-3 |
Photochemical ozone formation | POCP | kg NMVOC eq. | 1.39E-2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 4.01E-5 | 7.16E-4 | 1.34E-3 | -5.23E-4 |
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metals | ADP-minerals&metals1 | kg Sb eq. | 7.01E-5 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 2.93E-8 | 4.24E-6 | 1.40E-7 | -2.61E-6 |
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuels | ADP-fossil1 | MJ, net calorific value | 8.10E+1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.56E-1 | 2.37E+0 | 1.29E+0 | -3.12E+0 |
Water use | WDP1 | m3 world eq. deprived | 6.92E-1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 7.99E-4 | 1.19E-1 | -6.50E-1 | -1.85E-2 |
Acronyms | GWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption | ||||||||||||||||
General disclaimer | The results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services). | ||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer 1 | The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator |
Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators
Impact category | Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Climate change - GWP-GHG | GWP-GHG1 | kg CO2 eq. | 3.11E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.04E-2 | 2.09E-1 | 2.97E+0 | -1.15E-1 |
Acronyms | GWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas. | ||||||||||||||||
General disclaimer | The results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services). | ||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer 1 | The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero. |
Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804
Impact category | Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Particulate matter emissions | PM | Disease incidence | 1.62E-7 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.02E-9 | 8.51E-9 | 9.18E-9 | -6.08E-9 |
Ionizing radiation - human health | IRP1 | kBq U235 eq. | 1.13E-1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.38E-4 | 7.11E-3 | 3.18E-3 | -4.20E-3 |
Eco-toxicity - freshwater | ETP-fw2 | CTUe | 5.01E+1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 7.51E-2 | 2.26E+0 | 7.99E+1 | -1.89E+0 |
Human toxicity - cancer effects | HTP-c2 | CTUh | 2.67E-8 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.07E-10 | 1.31E-9 | 8.29E-10 | -1.00E-9 |
Human toxicity - non-cancer effects | HTP-nc2 | CTUh | 7.60E-8 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 2.00E-10 | 7.61E-9 | 3.79E-8 | -2.70E-9 |
Land-use related impacts/soil quality | SQP2 | Dimensionless | 2.19E+1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.57E-1 | 4.60E-1 | 2.40E+0 | -8.48E-1 |
Acronyms | PM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index. | ||||||||||||||||
General disclaimer | The results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services). | ||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer 1 | This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator. | ||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer 2 | The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator. |
Resource use indicators according to EN 15804
Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PERE | MJ, net calorific value | 8.21E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 2.05E-3 | 4.48E+0 | 3.99E-2 | -1.48E-1 |
PERM | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
PERT | MJ, net calorific value | 8.21E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 2.05E-3 | 4.48E+0 | 3.99E-2 | -1.48E-1 |
PENRE | MJ, net calorific value | 8.88E+1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.66E-1 | 2.54E+0 | 1.37E+0 | -3.42E+0 |
PENRM | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
PENRT | MJ, net calorific value | 8.88E+1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 1.66E-1 | 2.54E+0 | 1.37E+0 | -3.42E+0 |
SM | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
RSF | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
NRSF | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
FW | m3 | 6.97E-1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 8.02E-4 | 1.23E-1 | -6.50E-1 | -1.85E-2 |
Acronyms | PERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water. | |||||||||||||||
General disclaimer | The results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services). |
Waste indicators according to EN 15804
Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWD | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
NHWD | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
RWD | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
Acronyms | HWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed. | |||||||||||||||
General disclaimer | The results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services). |
Output flow indicators according to EN 15804
Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRU | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
MFR | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
MER | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
EEE | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
EET | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 | 0.00E+0 |
Acronyms | CRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy. | |||||||||||||||
General disclaimer | The results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services). |
References
EN ISO 14025:2011-10: Environmental labels and declarations
Type III environmental declarations — Principles and procedures
EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 Sustainability of construction works-Environmental Product Declarations — Core rules for the product category of construction products.
PCR 2019-14 v.1.3.4: EPD International. (2024). PCR 2019:14, Construction Products, Version 1.3.4. www.environdec.com.
ISO 14040:2006: Environmental management-Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework.
ISO 14044:2006: Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines (pp. 1–54).
REACH: Directive (EG) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council dated 18 December 2006 on the registration, evaluation, approval and restriction of chemical substances (REACH), for establishing a European Agency for chemical substances, for amending Directive 1999/45/EC and for annulment of Directive (EEC) No. 793/93 of the Council, Directive (EC) No. 1488/94 of the Commission, Guideline 76/769/EEC of the Council and Guidelines 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC of the Commission
SimaPro: SimaPro software for LCA calculations, developed by PRé Sustainability, Stationsplein 121, 3818 LE Amersfoort, Netherlands, https://simapro.com
Ecoinvent dataset, developed by the Swiss Centre for Life Cycle inventories, Technoparkstrasse 1,8005 Zurich, Switzerland, https://ecoinvent.org/
IPCC. (2021a). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
GPI: EPD International. (2024). General Programme Instructions for the International EPD® System. Version 5.0.1
GPI: EPD International. (2024). General Programme Instructions for the International EPD® System. Version 4.0
Version history
EPD Türkiye name has been changed in front page