9of15_Poste Italiane's comments on PCR draft doc

06 November 2013, 4:09:41 PM (GMT +1)

Para 7.1_third bullet: In IPC’s EMMS any emission deriving from use of electricity was included in the same scope (i.e. scope 2). With regard to PCR, could it be possible to estimate the consumption of electric means of transports (and, therefore,...

by: Simona Condorelli

8of15_Poste Italiane's comments on PCR draft doc

06 November 2013, 4:08:39 PM (GMT +1)

Para 7.1, first bullet: At the moment, it is impossible to separate energy consumed for production by energy used to climatise/illuminate/etc. the relevant buildings. Moreover, normally buildings are occupied by several functions, which makes the ...

by: Simona Condorelli

7of15_Poste Italiane's comments on PCR draft doc

06 November 2013, 4:07:37 PM (GMT +1)

Para 7.1 "System Boundaries": PosteItaliane and its subsidiaries have sub-suppliers of transport for which it is impossible to measure the impact of vehicle maintenance. Moreover we use full rent solution which includes maintenance. All this consi...

by: Simona Condorelli

6of15_Poste Italiane's comments on PCR draft doc

06 November 2013, 4:06:45 PM (GMT +1)

Para 7.1_System boundaries: Is the relevant perimeter considered here the Universal Service Obligation, or shall we refer to dedicated networks?

by: Simona Condorelli

5of15_Poste Italiane's comments on PCR draft doc

06 November 2013, 4:05:45 PM (GMT +1)

Para 6_"General Boundaries": Regarding the perimeter to be considered for measurement, please be aware that Poste Italiane is not able (nor we think it is correct to proceed in this respect) to separate activities directly concerning postal servic...

by: Simona Condorelli

4of15_Poste Italiane's comments on PCR draft doc

06 November 2013, 4:04:54 PM (GMT +1)

Para 3: We propose to amend the second sentence as follows: "The functional unit for parcel is one average kilogram and/or volume of a delivery ofthe defined service". As per our comment no. 2 above, please consider that the volumetric weight also...

by: Simona Condorelli

3of15_Poste Italiane's comments toPCR draft doc

06 November 2013, 4:02:49 PM (GMT +1)

Para. 2.2_Graph: NB: Poste Italiane does not make any distinction between parcels and packets.

by: Simona Condorelli

2of15_Poste Italiane's comments to PCR draft document

06 November 2013, 4:01:44 PM (GMT +1)

Para. 2.2 "Parcels" We shall take into account the fact that parcels up to 30 kg are managed differently from parcels exceeding that weight, both in terms of processing and in transportation, the latter requiring specific equipment to be handled, ...

by: Simona Condorelli

1of15 Poste Italiane's comments to the PCR draft document

06 November 2013, 4:00:21 PM (GMT +1)

Para. 2.2, "Unaddressed mail": NB: the UPU regulation does not include the unaddressed mail product. We propose that this category be maintained, deleting the reference to UPU regulation.

by: Simona Condorelli

1of15 Poste Italiane's comments to the PCR draft document(2)

06 November 2013, 4:00:19 PM (GMT +1)

Para. 2.2, "Unaddressed mail": NB: the UPU regulation does not include the unaddressed mail product. We propose that this category be maintained, deleting the reference to UPU regulation.

by: Simona Condorelli